served on the plaintiff herein on 8.1.2011 in India, by a Special Process Server appointed by the Superior Court of Cobb County. Despite service ... were all served in India, on the plaintiff herein by a Special Process Server appointed by the Court of Cobb County, on 8.1.2011.
l. After
meticulously followed by the process
server while serving summons and warrants: ...
***
4. District Process Server Pool:- A District Process
Server Pool shall be created ... Delhi. On receipt of processes related to
outside Delhi, SHO will send the processes to I/C Distt.
Process Server Pool for service
Court to serve the defendants today itself by special process server apart
from service of notice by registered as well as ordinary modes. Thereafter
Karnataka Civil Rules of Practice, 1967:
"Rule 224. Special Process Servers.- The Presiding Officer of any Court may direct, on the application ... executed by a Special Process Server or Amin from head quarters, provided that, the charges for such process server at the rate
Special
Court to be executed on them, by hiding
themselves and not making themselves
available at the given residential addresses, in
SLP ... 13956 of 2023 Page 7 of 55
collusion with the process servers, the Special
Court had to issue non-bailable warrants
against the respondents from
liable to be reversed.
16. As per prosecution version the Police (Special Cell of Delhi Police) had a secret
information regarding arrival of the Respondent ... Bhagmal resident of Kotla Mubarakpur. In fact ASI Ram Kumar (Process Server
of Special Cell) made a report dated 21.07.2006 that the summons for appearance
ORDER
D.A. Desai, J.
1. Special leave granted.
2. One Muthukrishnan was working as a process server in the District Court at Madurai
this respect the statements of Mst. Guddi. her father Lal Singh, Process Server, Manphool and witness Lad u Ram in whose presence notice was affixed ... From reading the statements of all these witnesses and specially the statement of Process Server, it is clear that the notice was sent
Code is of the process server, but the affirmation of the statement is not by the process server but by the Nazir. In my opinion ... Nazir and not by the process server. Secondly, it is not in the Special form, i.e., in Form 11 of the Appendix
which the
process was served, with special reference to Order 5,
Rules 15 and 17.
(b) Signature of process server.
or,
(3) One accompanied ... which the
process was served, with special reference to Order 5,
Rules 15 and 17.
(b) Signature of process server.
or,
If substituted service
