Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 269 (0.68 seconds)

P Prema vs Ut Of Pondicherry on 4 October, 2019

vertical (social) reservations will not apply to horizontal (special) reservations. Where a special reservation for women is provided within the social reservation ... treating the 20% reservation for women as a vertical reservation, instead of a horizontal reservation within the vertical reservation." The Hon'ble Supreme
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M Arunachalam vs M/O Railways on 12 October, 2022

disposed of." 14. The judgment dated 25.10.2021 passed in Special Leave Appeal (Civil) No.27300/2019, wherein the aforesaid order/judgment dated ... prevalent for the time being, we cannot fault the impugned judgment. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed." 15. Paras
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S Thavamani vs M/O Defence on 30 July, 2024

doubt a prerequisite for reservation in promotion for PWD. There cannot be methodology used to defeat the reservation in promotion. Once that post is identified ... absence of rules to provide for reservation in promotion would not defeat the rights of PWD to a reservation in promotion as it flows from
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K Vijaya Bhaskar vs Railway Board on 1 March, 2023

prepared without following the reservation roster. Due to violation of this reservation policy, they were excluded from the panel of IRSME ... given in its order dated 17.05.2018 in SLP(C ) No. 30621/2011 and order dated 05.06.2018 in Special Leave to Appeal (C ) No. 28306/2017
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hvf Employees Union vs M/O Defence on 21 April, 2023

satisfying the conditions mentioned in DOPT OM dt 4.1.2013 by ensuring the reservation rosters which are strictly maintained as per the instructions/guidelines issued ... SLP No.30621/2011. 17 = It is to be noted that again petitions were filed against the interim order passed in SLP No30621/2011
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

T Asohkumar vs Ut Of Pondicherry on 26 February, 2026

belonging to the MBC quota, who would have been selected irrespective of reservation, were not considered against general vacancies. Instead, 9 OA/310/01190/2016 ... petition. Challenging the said decision , the State of Tamil Nadu preferred a Special Leave Petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The relevant portion
Central Administrative Tribunal - Madras Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next