The State Of Karnataka vs V.Ashok on 5 December, 2018
send the Micro Cassettes, MO4, 10 & 8 to spectrography test, as
it was not available. Yet, MO4, 10 and 8 are not considered
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.59 seconds)State vs . 1. R.C. Anand on 3 February, 2012
State vs . 1. R.C. Anand on 3 February, 2012
IN THE COURT OF SHRI
Title : State (Cbi) vs . on 30 April, 2012
Vijender Singh Ex.Q2(C) by
auditory and voice spectrography technique with respect to their
specimen voices which was marked
Cbi vs . Ashok Jain on 31 October, 2012
Ashok Jain Page No.15
16
spectrography technique and he found that questioned voice
of Ashok Jain tallied with his specimen voice
Reliance On 1986 Cr.Lj 1101 (Ramesh vs . State) And Also on 21 January, 2013
claimed that he had given the breaks while listening the
cassettes when spectrography as well as auditory tests were
conducted but he did not remember
1