Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

State vs Mohd. Afzal And Ors. [Along With Crl. A. ... on 29 October, 2003 Equivalent

voice of the appellant, by applying the technique of auditory and voice spectrography and found that the specimen voice in the cassette SV as well

cassette marked as Mark Q1 and S1 by auditory and voice spectrography and found that the voice sample marked

voice sample of the Appellant was neither taken nor sent for voice spectrography nor did the expert opine that there was no tempering/ interpolation ... same was not sent to the expert at the CFSL for voice spectrography analysis. Learned Trial Court has erroneously on the identification of the Complainant

were produced nor was the sample voice of Sultan taken for comparison (spectrography). Thus, the prosecution has failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Sultan

voice samples of the accused and send the same for voice spectrography analysis thus resulting in the loss of valuable evidence. 10. Thus

State ( Nct Of Delhi) vs Brijesh Singh @ Brajesh Thakur Arun ... on 26 March, 2025 Author

conducted by the method of Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrography and chemical analysis of Sample Nos. 27 and 28 was conducted by the method