Const. Ram Kumar
(No. 391/W) were taken and sent for voice spectrography
alongwith questioned video cassettes for spectrography report /
opinion. A report was received ... that they were having similar
linguistic and phonetic features. The analysis of spectrography
examination of the common clue words / sentences selected
from the specimen voices
CFSL, New Delhi along with the questioned
video cassette for obtaining the spectrography report vide letter
Ex.PW3/B. Subsequently, there was a report ... done
by resorting i.e. speaker identification by conducting
spectrography analysis and other auditory examinations to
determine the voice of the speaker and by examination
Cbi vs . Anup Kumar Srivastava Etc. Judgement ... on 26 August, 2016
CBI Vs. Anup Kumar
argued that PW
6 has further admitted that the spectrography test
could not be carried out due to presence of lot of
interfering noises ... examined the recordings which had been
sent to him; the voice spectrography comparison of
questioned and specimen voice could not be carried
resorting i.e. speaker identification by conducting
spectrography analysis and other auditory examinations to
determine the voice of the speaker and by examination of
videotapes
Cc No.15/19 State vs Vinod Kumar 1 on 16 November, 2019
IN THE
Delhi along with the questioned
video cassettes for getting the voice spectrography report. He
had sent the same by forwarding letter
U.P. vs . Anil Singh, Air 1988 Sc 1998, Supreme ... on 21 May, 2019
CBI
defence. She adopted prevalent scientific instrument and method
of audiography and spectrography. Her opinion/report is based on
CC No.98/19 State Vs Subhash
Tiwari and Gulshan Kumar with their
questioned voices through auditory and voice spectrography technique, it was
found that the questioned voices were in the voices
