carry out further
investigation and obtaining voice sample for carrying
out voice spectrography test, requirement of
respondent No.1 was needed ... personally
remained present and his voice sample for carrying
out voice spectrography test was also taken. He
further submits that the voice spectrography test
preferred on behalf of the revision petitioner/
accused for voice spectrography of PW-2 has been rejected.
6. Facts of the case in brief ... 2025 was
preferred on behalf of the revision petitioner/ accused for voice spectrography of PW-2
regarding the conversation between PW-2 and wife
preferred on behalf of the revision petitioner/
accused for voice spectrography of PW-2 has been rejected.
6. Facts of the case in brief ... 2025 was
preferred on behalf of the revision petitioner/ accused for voice spectrography of PW-2
regarding the conversation between PW-2 and wife
trap
operation were unsuccessful, and the case is based on a voice spectrography
test. Merely the demand being made by the applicant, and the offense ... already done so and provided a
sample for the voice spectrography test. The applicant has no prior criminal
record.Now nothing remains to be recovered
recovered or discovered as the charge-sheet
is filed. Only voice spectrography test is to be conducted for which the
applicant has already filed ... past antecedent;
(6) Applicant is ready and willing to appear for voice
spectrography test before the FSL and is ready to file
undertaking in that
mobile and the said record was sent to FSL for
spectrography test and pursuant thereto, FSL report has
been received, which clearly goes ... said recording was sent to
FSL for the purpose of obtaining spectrography test and
pursuant thereto, report of spectrography test received
clearly goes
State ( Nct Of Delhi) vs Brijesh Singh @ Brajesh Thakur Arun ... on 26 March, 2025
Author
Deepak Astickar vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 November, 2025
Author: M.Nagaprasanna
Bench
along with the voice spectrography report at
Exhibit 79. However, it is found that the mandatory certificate under Section
65B(4) of the Indian Evidence
failed to obtain the transcript of
conversation nor he did a voice spectrography of the
accused to identify the voice of the call; thus
