case as one of the conspirators.
He was shown in the charge-sheet as accused no. 33.
Cognizance was taken by the special court ... case against the
appellant and some others had to be split up as
Crl.A.311/17
4
they could not be arrested. The case
petitioner herein along with nine other persons stood
charge sheeted for offences punishable under the above provisions
of law. All the accused except the petitioner ... allegation against the accused. The case against the petitioner
herein was split up and re-filed. Since the accused again remained
absent, it was relegated
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES
---------------------------------
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF CHARGE SHEET IN 222/2010 OF VALAYAM
POLICE STATION KOZHIKODE
ANNEXURE A2 ACOPY ... Nadapuram. As the third petitioner was absconding, the
case against him was split up and refiled as LP No. 20
of 2012. The case against
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------
ANNEXURE 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF CHARGE IN C.C 841/2012 OF THE JFCM-1,
PATHANAMTHITTA
ANNEXURE 2 AFFIDAVIT ... Originally the petitioners
along with 2 other accused were charge sheeted in C.C.
No.261/2007 of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court 1,
Pathanamthitta
Swaraj vs State Of Kerala on 23 February, 2017
Author: Sunil Thomas
Bench: Sunil Thomas
John Joseph @ Binoy vs State Of Kerala on 21 July, 2017
Author: K. Abraham Mathew
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------
ANNEXURE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET BEFORE THE DISTRICT
AND SESSIONS COURT-2, PATHANAMTHITTA
ANNEXURE B TRUE COPY ... accused was acquitted.
The case against the petitioner herein was split and refiled as
S.C.No.238/2016.
2. The petitioner herein contends that
Balamukundan vs State Of Kerala on 14 February, 2017
Author: Sunil Thomas
Bench: Sunil Thomas
Akhil.M vs State Of Kerala on 27 March, 2017
Author: Sunil Thomas
Bench: Sunil
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEURES :
ANNEXURE A1: COPY OF THE CHARGE SHEET IN CRIME NO. 265/2011
OF KODUVALLY POLICE STATION.
ANNEXURE A2: COPY ... read with 34 of the IPC . This is
a split up case from S.C. No.237 of 2012 on the file of
the said
