case, the Investigating Officer after
investigating the case, submitted charge sheet against one accused only on
15.12.1992 whereas the investigation was kept open ... charge
sheet, the court took cognizance against Anil Sahay against whom charge
sheet has been submitted and the record was split up whereby case
that the charge-sheet was submitted against
the co-accused of the same incident along with the petitioner but
the case was split ... that the
informant of this case has died and since the charge-sheet has
been submitted there is no chance of tampering with the evidence
accordingly
final form was submitted against the appellants vide Supplementary
Charge Sheet No. 53 of 2002 dated 23.09.2002. The learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate, by order ... charge
sheet who surrendered in the court on 24.08.2006 and he faced trial,
Kauleshwar Yadav was convicted vide judgment dated 04.09.2017 in
split up record
accordingly, the records
of the case qua them were split up. A charge-sheet was filed against Sunil
Pawsan, Dilip Bhuian, Santosh Dangi, Srawan Dangi
conclusion of investigation the first charge-sheet
was submitted against Markus Lakra, Gandur Lakra and Jitan
Baitha showing Bijla Tigga as an absconder and keeping ... Tigga was absconding his
record was split up and subsequently he was arrested and a
supplementary charge-sheet was filed after which his case
persons under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code and
after investigation, charge-sheet was submitted under Sections
392 and 411 Indian Penal Code against ... dated 22.11.2008, the trial of
one of the charge-sheeted accused namely, Mahesh Dosi was
split up due to his absence and the remaining
were ante-mortem in nature.
5. On completion of the investigation, charge-sheet was
submitted against the appellant and cognizance of the offence was
taken ... Pahan having been shown to be absconders in the charge-
sheet, their cases were split up from the original case record. Later on,
co-accused
process, he has been arrested and in split-up trial out of seven charge-
sheeted witnesses, five witnesses have already been examined and the applicant
case of the
petitioner was split up. The Investigating Officer had
submitted supplementary charge sheet No. 165 of 2019 dated
31.03.2019 against the petitioner keeping
submits that the trial of this appellant
was split up, though altogether six persons were charge sheeted in
connection with Serengdag P.S. Case
