right in pointing out that though they
were absconding and split charge sheet Is ordered to be
flied, no purpose would be served, because ... charge sheet against the
petitioners based on the FIR In Cr.No.79/2008 converted
to CC No.337/2008 filing of fresh charge sheet
acquitted accused Nos.1, 3, 5 and 6.
Now a split charge sheet is filed against the petitioner
and accused ... petitioner and
he is in judicial custody.
3. In the split charge sheet the Sessions Judge
acquitted accused
night of 1.11.1984.
4. On conclusion of the investigation, a single charge sheet in respect
of all the incidents which took place during riots ... However, on the directions of the learned
Trial Judge, aforesaid charge sheet was split into separate charge sheets
relating to specific incidents
absconding. Therefore, the case
against the petitioner was split up
and charge-sheet was laid against
other available accused Nos.1 and 3
for committing ... petitioner was arrested and
proceedings were revived against
him in the split charge sheet.... In the
instant case also, the full pledged
trial was held
their safety.
4. On conclusion of the investigation, a single charge sheet in respect
of all the incidents which took place during riots at Block ... However, on the directions of the learned
trial Judge, aforesaid charge sheet was split into separate charge sheets
relating to specific incidents
2006 against
accused No.5 to 10. Thereafter split up charge sheet was
filed against accused ... accused No.4 was said to be absconding
no split up charge sheet was filed against him. As such,
the Sessions Court proceeded as against
learned II
Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi. In the meantime,
split-up charge sheet was filed and case against accused
No.3 is registered ... reasonable
doubt. In the meantime, the petitioner remained
absconding and split-up charge sheet was filed which is
registered in S.C.No.175/2019
120B , 506 read with Section 149 of IPC.
Subsequently, a split up charge sheet has been filed by
the Police against this petitioner ... accused person who was absconding and
subsequently against whom a split up
charge sheet was filed was quashed."
9. In view of the dictum
have been acquitted. He
submits that a split charge sheet has been filed against the
present petitioner. He submits that even according to the
prosecution ... seven years
and he has delayed the process of trial. The split charge
sheet has been filed against him and in the event of grant
spite of committing the
case in respect of present accused and splitting in
respect of remaining number.
6
5. At this stage, considering the absconding ... Judge could have chosen the next provision
of law regarding the splitting charge sheet or
otherwise.
6. In the result, the application is devoid
