Conditions of Service of Non-Teaching Employees)
Rules, 1984, ("Standard Code Rules 1984" for short) the
encashment in respect of only 120 days ... from 1.1.1996 the State Government provided
Standard Code of 1999 and it made changes in the Standard Code
Rules of 1984. The pay scales came
under Rule 42(a), Rule 41 (3), Rule 41(10), Rule 42(c), Rule 42(m) and Rule 42(R) of the Standard Code Rules ... Agricultural Universities and Affiliated Colleges, Standard Code Rules, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the said rule). The said rule inter alia provides for issuance
employees) Rules, 1999 (hereafter “1999
Rules”). Under Rule 12 of the said Rules it is provided as follows:
“Rule 12. Overriding Effect of Rules ... Colleges Standard Code (Non Teaching Employees Revised Pay) Rules, 2009
(hereafter “2009 Rules”). Rule 17 of the said Rules reads as follows:
Rule
that the regular recruitment procedure is also there in the Standard Code Rule 1984 for Non-teaching staff of Class III employees. The respondent ... contended, was not appointed in terms of Rule 3(III)(b)(1) as prescribed under Standard Code which are applicable for recruiting regular employees
governed by the Non- agricultural Universities and Affiliated Colleges Standard Code Rules, 1984 and in that view of Rule 116-D thereof, the employees
employees)
Rules, 1999 (hereafter “1999 Rules”). Under Rule 12 of the said Rules
it is provided as follows:
“Rule 12. Overriding Effect of Rules ... Colleges Standard Code (Non Teaching Employees Revised
Pay) Rules, 2009 (hereafter “2009 Rules”). Rule 17 of the said Rules
reads as follows:
Rule
petitioner Smt. Dadhakar was not
issued under the provisions of the Standard Code Rules, 1984.
It is submitted that the same was issued under ... petitioner Mrs. Dhadkar that
the provisions of Rule 46 of the Standard Code were not followed
which has resulted into conduction of a biased inquiry
Terms and Conditions of Service of Non-
Teaching Employees) Rules, 1984, (hereinafter the Standard Code).
Similarly, continuous absence for more than two years was also ... mind that he was held guilty for breach of Rule 42 (g) of the
Standard Code which requires conviction in respect of an offence
involving
Dr.J.Santhosh Kumar vs The Block Medical Officer on 24 July, 2012
Author: S
Shivaji Education Society, awarded major penalty of dismissal.
Reading of rule of this Standard Code does not show that
::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 ... Standard Code i.e. the
Maharashtra Non- Agricultural Universities and Affiliated
Colleges Standard Code (Terms and Conditions of Service of Non-
Teaching Employees) Rules
