Fir No.07/09 State vs . Bhagirath And Deepak Nanda on 6 January, 2014
Fir No.07/09 State vs . Bhagirath And Deepak Nanda on 6 January, 2014
FIR
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 712 (1.49 seconds)Musstt Mamuda Begum And Anr vs The State Of Assam And Anr on 20 September, 2019
case by exhibiting the 161 CrPC statement of PW.7, Exhibit 10
placed before the learned Trial Judge that the said PW.7 stated before ... case by exhibiting Exhibit-10, the 161 CrPC statement of the said
PW.7 placed before the learned Trial Judge that the said
Nipun Gola @ Nikhil vs State on 3 April, 2014
calls however, this fact was not mentioned in his
statement under Section 161 marked Exhibit PW-9/DA. He stated
that it was incorrect ... above, PW-9 in his Section 161 Cr.P.C. statement marked Exhibit
PW-9/DA had not stated that there were repeated exchange
Sri Bhagwan vs State Of U.P on 6 December, 2012
acid bottle (Exhibit-1), Nausadar (Exhibit-
2), gloves (Exhibit-4), and bag (Exhibit-3) from the spot under memo
(Exhibit Ka-17). The inquest memo ... tongue, he was incapable
of making any statement and, therefore, the alleged statement under
Section 161 Cr.P.C. stated to have been recorded
Harjinder Singh @ Goldi vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 8 April, 2005
accused resisted. She was confronted with her statement under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Exhibit P.D.) wherein it is recorded that ... motor cycle in his cross-examination but in his statement under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Exhibit-PB) he has not said
Satnam Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 17 December, 1999
person, lie also
referred to several omissions in his statement recorded
under Sec. 161 but on going through those omissions, we are
unable to persuade ... witness it
appears that in his earlier statement recorded under Sec.
161 Cr.P.C., which is . Exhibit D-3, he had not. even
indicated
Abdul Hameed Teeli S/O Mohammad vs State Of J&K Through Police Station on 13 September, 2023
relative. Deceased was also his relative.
His statement was recorded u/s 161 Cr.P.C to this extent. It is not correct that ... correct
and it is exhibited as EXPW-9/5. He has recorded statement of Mst. Rafiqa
u/s 161
Asraf Ansari vs The State Of West Bengal on 28 March, 2023
tendered the seizure
list dated September 5, 2013 which was marked as Exhibit
14.
42. The police constable who had seen PW 11 deposit ... marked as Material Exhibit III. The
seizure list had been marked as Exhibit 16. Police had
recorded his statement under Section 161 of the Criminal
Amar Pal vs State Of U.P. on 21 November, 2022
that he had recorded statement of the deceased under Section 161 Cr.P.C., therefore, is not reliable.
26. The statement of the doctor ... evidence, when we go through the statement of the injured recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C, Exhibit Ka-'11', the said statement
Ajay Sharma @ Mitthu @ Pramendra vs State Of Rajasthan Through Pp on 14 December, 2017
named the accused-appellant in his
police statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. (Exhibit D-1).
Even in the police statement ... what he told to the
police in his statement (Exhibit D-4) recorded under Section 161
(22 of 26)
[CRLA-885/2015