granted by the RKCL to the petitioners for the post of Stenographers.
As the pleaded facts would reveal, a process for filling up various posts ... stenographers was initiated by advertisement dated 06.09.2011 by the respondent-Commission, in which, amongst others, academic condition of eligibility, as prescribed by the Rules
granted by the RKCL to the petitioners for the post of Stenographers.
As the pleaded facts would reveal, a process for filling up various posts ... stenographers was initiated by advertisement dated 06.09.2011 by the respondent-Commission, in which, amongst others, academic condition of eligibility, as prescribed by the Rules
granted by the RKCL to the petitioners for the post of Stenographers.
As the pleaded facts would reveal, a process for filling up various posts ... stenographers was initiated by advertisement dated 06.09.2011 by the respondent-Commission, in which, amongst others, academic condition of eligibility, as prescribed by the Rules
granted by the RKCL to the petitioners for the post of Stenographers.
As the pleaded facts would reveal, a process for filling up various posts ... stenographers was initiated by advertisement dated 06.09.2011 by the respondent-Commission, in which, amongst others, academic condition of eligibility, as prescribed by the Rules
granted by the RKCL to the petitioners for the post of Stenographers.
As the pleaded facts would reveal, a process for filling up various posts ... stenographers was initiated by advertisement dated 06.09.2011 by the respondent-Commission, in which, amongst others, academic condition of eligibility, as prescribed by the Rules
granted by the RKCL to the petitioners for the post of Stenographers.
As the pleaded facts would reveal, a process for filling up various posts ... stenographers was initiated by advertisement dated 06.09.2011 by the respondent-Commission, in which, amongst others, academic condition of eligibility, as prescribed by the Rules
granted by the RKCL to the petitioners for the post of Stenographers.
As the pleaded facts would reveal, a process for filling up various posts ... stenographers was initiated by advertisement dated 06.09.2011 by the respondent-Commission, in which, amongst others, academic condition of eligibility, as prescribed by the Rules
post aforesaid is higher than four years experience required as Assistant/ Accountant/ Stenographer Gr I. The petitioner thus wrongfully treated as ineligible.
Dr Sandeep Tandon ... having four years' experience as Assistant/ Accountant/ Stenographer Gr I. He was basically an Inspector in ITBP which is not equivalent post
respondents. The second litigation came on the same issue regarding post of Stenographer and therein bunch of writ petitions led by Amarchand Prajapati ... precisely on the ground that judgment in the case of Stenographer namely; Amarchand Prajapati (supra) has been treated in rem by the RPSC then
respondents. The second litigation came on the same issue regarding post of Stenographer and therein bunch of writ petitions led by Amarchand Prajapati ... precisely on the ground that judgment in the case of Stenographer namely; Amarchand Prajapati (supra) has been treated in rem by the RPSC then
