family members, the petitioner was conducted LSCS with Sterilization
operation. The petitioner also gave undertaking before undergoing the family
planning operation to the effect that ... operation, the
petitioner was made to believe that after the operation, she would not
conceive. Therefore, the act of the medical officer, who conducted
sterilization
opted for sterilization, developed
pregnancy and ultimately gave birth to a female child in
spite of sterilization operation which, obviously, had failed ... operation, the petitioner was made to believe that
after the operation, she would not conceive. Therefore, the act of the
medical officer, who conducted sterilization
stated that
instead of taking reasonable care in performing sterilization
operation and in spite operation being successful, there could
be a conception. The respondents blamed ... same
could have been rectified. Therefore, the failure of the
sterilization operation was not seriously disputed by the
respondents and for such failure, the petitioner
stated that
instead of taking reasonable care in performing sterilization
operation and in spite operation being successful, there could
be a conception. The respondents blamed ... same
could have been rectified. Therefore, the failure of the
sterilization operation was not seriously disputed by the
respondents and for such failure, the petitioner
stated that
instead of taking reasonable care in performing sterilization
operation and in spite operation being successful, there could
be a conception. The respondents blamed ... same
could have been rectified. Therefore, the failure of the
sterilization operation was not seriously disputed by the
respondents and for such failure, the petitioner
stated that instead
of taking reasonable care in performing sterilization operation and
in spite operation being successful, there could be a conception.
The respondents blamed ... same could have been rectified.
Therefore, the failure of the sterilization operation was not
seriously disputed by the respondents and for such failure, the
petitioner
petitioner for the medical negligence of the respondents
leading to sterilization operation failure to the petitioner and consequent birth
of disabled child namely Jerson ... medical negligence of the respondents leading to sterilization operation
failure to the petitioner and consequent birth of disabled child namely Jerson
this
Court. Further, considering the risk factor of 0.5% during
sterilization operation is involved, it cannot be construed that
the Medical Officer had performed operation
that after the birth of her
second daughter, she underwent sterilization operation at Government
Hospital at Tirunelveli. Even thereafter, she was pregnant and a female
