submitted that since, the applicant
no. 3 had already undergone the sterilization
operation and he is not competent for reproduction,
therefore, under these circumstances ... false and
baseless.
So far as the question of undergoing the
sterilization operation is concerned, it has nothing to
do with an intention to outrage
said proceeding of
conjugal rights, has gone for her sterilization operation on
09.10.2009 wherein she was found to be pregnant carrying
pregnancy of 40 days
perusal of the facts of the said authority, reveals that sterilization operation was undergone by one of the spouses without the knowledge of the other
after the birth of the second child, the deceased was
done sterilization operation. The lower Court has arrived at a conclusion
that there
sterilization operation done
on 20.09.2018 also goes to show that the operation was done with
her consent as sterilization operation cannot be conducted against
mental cruelty.
(xi) If a husband submits himself for an operation of sterilization without
medical reasons and without the consent or knowledge of his wife
mental cruelty.
(xi) If a husband submits himself for an operation of sterilization without
medical reasons and without the consent or knowledge of his wife
mental
cruelty.
(xi) If a husband submits himself for an operation of
sterilization without medical reasons and without the
consent or knowledge of his wife
mental cruelty.
(xi) If a husband submits himself for an operation
of sterilization without medical reasons and
without the consent or knowledge of his wife
mental
cruelty.
(xi) If a husband submits himself for an operation of
sterilization without medical reasons and without the
consent or knowledge of his wife