Mamta Gupta, the
Gynecologists who had conducted the Laproscopic
Sterilization operation upon Nirmala on 4.3.1985 as their
witnesses. Vide judgment and decree dated ... family planning in
India. According to Nirmala she had undergone the
sterilization operation so that she is able to bring up her
two children
operation and result thereof to her husband who accompanied her to get
the operation before performing the operation. She further deposed that
sterilization operation ... operation at the time of conducting the said
operation. He admitted that he put his signatures on certain forms before
conducting the said operation
doctors of
defendant no.2. The doctors have performed the sterilization operation
with utmost care and caution and the present suit is a tool ... Government had
started an insurance scheme under which any failure of sterilization
operation is granted the compensation of Rs. 30,000/ so the plaintiff
case of sterilization failure. One
of the most commonly used methods of sterilization is
laproscopic sterilization which was adopted in the case of the
plaintiff ... sterilized every year in the country
bu the percentage of failure of sterilization is very small. That
the plaintiff was educated bout sterilization operation
Mamta Gupta, the
Gynecologists who had conducted the Laptroscopic
Sterilization operation upon Nirmala on 4.3.1985 as their
witnesses. Vide judgment and decree dated ... family planning in
India. According to Nirmala she had undergone the
sterilization operation so that she is able to bring up her
two children
Lakhs towards compensation due to failure of her
sterilization operation.
2. The precise case of the plaintiff as per her suit as under:
That ... Certificate of
Sterilization is Ex. PW1/A. Said sterilization operation is found to
have been conducted by Dr. Rachna who was the Sr. Resident
certificate of sterilization bearing sl. no. 386727
dated 06.07.04.
5. It is alleged that the plaintiff conceived even after the said
sterilization operation. Her pregnancy ... time of sterilization?OPD.
2. Whether plaintiff failed to take precautions as per the
advice of defendant no.1 after sterilization operation?
OPD
17. Issue
sterilization and accordingly, she
approached the defendant no.3 on 12.10.1999 for sterilization and was
admitted in the hospital and the sterilization operation was done ... operation was
successful. She had admitted to have told the plaintiff that her
operation was successful and that the operation included sterilization.
She further answered
conducting the operation.
He denied that he had left the operation in between and committed negligence and
had completed the half operation ... operation. The plaintiff has therefore, established
that defendant no.2 Dr. Kadam, carried out the MTP operation negligently and even
though operation was not successful
years for incentives for promoting the
small family norms against the sterilization
operated upon his wife as per office order
no. 22 vide ... Prior to that, it is not the case
that fact of sterilization operation was informed to the department by
the workman through any written communication
