India , Paliakalan
on 25.10.2002 and the bank forwarded request for stop payment of drafts to
its service branch in Delhi by fax as well ... draft was in total as Rs. 1,66,560/. The
draft could not reach the destination. He tried to stop the payment against the
draft
agree to this.
On next date, the appellants through a demand draft for Rs.10,00,000/-
(rupees ten lacs) and returned cotton yarn worth ... cheque was
dishonoured because accused Satish Singhla had got the payment of the
cheque stopped and that all the accused by mutual consent (conspiracy)
have
agree to this.
On next date, the appellants through a demand draft for Rs.10,00,000/-
(rupees ten lacs) and returned cotton yarn worth ... cheque was
dishonoured because accused Satish Singhla had got the payment of the
cheque stopped and that all the accused by mutual consent (conspiracy)
have
lakh
to the said Nanjunda Reddy in the form of demand draft
and entered into an agreement of sale. The lands were
acquired by KIADB ... 32585/2000 were
dishonoured since the drawer (accused) had issued
'stop payment' instruments to her banker.
The complainant had issued undated receipts
which
that since the stock was still lying with him, he had stopped
the payment of the cheque. In his evidence, the accused has
admitted that ... stock/material from them by paying the amount through
cheques and drafts and already paid the amount to them after
receiving the goods. He further
February 1997
that he had already paid the said amount through demand draft so why the cheques
were presented. In the said letter he also ... deposed that he had
no outstanding liability towards the complainant when he stopped dealing with the
complainant. As per him he was not be liable
memorandum issued by
Canara Bank on 9.4.2007 with remarks "payment stopped by drawer",
Ex. CW1/C is the envelope alongwith original letter ... instruction was given to the banker of accused no.
1 to stop payment against the cheque in question. It is stated that the
cheque
complainant and the accused were in trade regularly
therefore the advance payment made by the accused company had
CC No. 69/13 9/32
remained ... However, since the delivery
of material was delayed therefore they had stopped the payment of the
cheques in question and the complainant company had assured
Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod vs State Of Maharashtra on 1 August, 2014
Author: Vikramajit Sen
Bench
M/S Soft-Touch Computer vs The State Of Maharashtra on 22 April, 2014
Author
