Earth Quake fire and Stock Rs. 0.50 ps.
(c) Storm, cyclone, typhoon,
tempest, hurricane, tornado,
flood and innundation ... premium of Rs. 3.10 per mille with additional cover for Flood, Storm and Tempest (hereinafter referred to as FST) against the premium
There were no signs of uprooting of GCI roof sheets due to storm / cyclone as alleged in respect of white sugar go down.However ... asbestos roof sheets and other civil structures were caused due to storm / super cyclone on 12th / 13th October, 2013 which swept over the various areas
from the respondent Insurance Company covering the risk of fire, storm, typhoon, flood and inundation and other perils etc. for the period 25/04/2008 ... complainant, during the period from 10.06.2008 to 12.06.2008, due to heavy rains, storm and typhoon, a good quantity of Tendu leaves at Kandhari unit
2010, the roof of the godown collapsed due to thunder storm and heavy rain and rain water entered into the godown causing damage ... hour in Karnal, which could not be termed as storm and could not lead to collapse of the roof of the building. The loss suffered
party for the year 2000-2001, covering damage inundation on account of storm, cyclone, typhoon, tempest, flood and inundation. The case of the complainant ... stock lying in the factory. It is claimed that there was no storm or cyclone during the aforesaid period in the area where the said
obligation is liable to pay for the loss caused due to storm"?
2. There is no dispute about the fact that the complainant/ appellant ... amount paid towards premium was recovered from the complainant.
3. There was storm and heavy rain on 2.6.1992 and the factory building collapsed
which was approximately 80 kilometers an hour did not qualify as a storm keeping in view the beaufort scale which defines the speed ... storm between 88 kms. to 100 kms. an hour. Thus the damage was not due to any storm as such not a covered risk under
cause was again stated to be snowfall. Nowhere was any mention of storm or snowstorm as cause of loss was stated. The State Commission failed ... their own Claim that the cause of loss was snowfall and not storm or snowstorm.
(b) They appointed an independent and IRDA certified Surveyor
pointed out the below mentioned facts:
* There was no evidence of storm at Falta SEZ on the date of incident, as evidenced through Meteorological data ... well as newspapers, which did not report any storm at Falta during the night of April 8, 2007 or April 9, 2007.
* There was evidence
pointed out the below mentioned facts:
* There was no evidence of storm at Falta SEZ on the date of incident, as evidenced through Meteorological data ... well as newspapers, which did not report any storm at Falta during the night of April 8, 2007 or April 9, 2007.
* There was evidence
