Prasanta
Mondal, however, transferred half satak of said tank to a stranger
purchaser namely Bamdeb Mondal by a registered deed of conveyance
dated 28th ... also a co-
sharer of said tank and not a stranger purchaser. On the death of said pre-
emptee Bamdeb Mondal his heirs were brought
thinks fit is to be exercised judicially and as
such the stranger purchaser would be entitled to
receive that amount which he paid ... made
with the intention to impose penalty on the
stranger purchaser. Equally it was not intended
that stranger purchaser would make a profit
thinks fit is to be exercised judicially and as
such the stranger purchaser would be entitled to
receive that amount which he paid ... made
with the intention to impose penalty on the
stranger purchaser. Equally it was not intended
that stranger purchaser would make a profit
Smt Sarasamma W/O P Nagaraj vs Karnataka State Finance Corporation on 13 March, 2013
said amount for execution
of the sale deed by the defendant stranger purchaser. Hence, the
question of discretionary power of the court available under
section ... above position of law and further
finding that the stranger purchaser would not be entitled to make
a profit out of the sale transaction since
independent raiyats under the state. So, if the pre-
emptors had purchased the entire share of Kishori via the
heirs of Radhanath Mondal, the question ... land wherefrom a portion or share
had been sold to the stranger purchasers. Therefore, the
defence stance has not been properly considered by the
Lower
decimals of suit plot to the pre-emptee Shyamali
Bera being stranger purchaser by a kobala dated 30th of March, 2005
which was registered ... sharer of the suit plot, and was rather a stranger purchaser. If
that be the factual aspects then said deed of gift dated
therefore be taken only as a property in joint possession of the
purchaser. In this case, it must be noted that the plaintiff was
pleading ... preferred mode would at all times be to
compel a stranger purchaser to apply for a general partition and to
allot the share
case of the
petitioner that although pre-emptor alone purchased and paid the
entire consideration money yet out of love and affection for his
younger ... Opposite Party No.1
in the pre-emption application is a stranger purchaser and,
therefore, the pre-emptor, namely, the predecessor of the Opposite
Parties
emption against the stranger
purchasers/petitioners herein and that application was
dismissed by the learned Trial Judge. Being aggrieved,
the pre-emptor preferred an appeal ... find that
there is no dispute that the petitioners are the stranger
purchasers in respect of the land in case being L.R. Plot
