present suit for declaration that
defendant Inder Kumar Jain being a stranger purchaser
whose right have been extinguished by passage of time being
not acted ... northern part of the
house. Therefore, he cannot be termed as stranger purchaser.
Since, he is in possession, therefore, provision of Section 27
and Article
land containing a dwelling
house therein and as such, the stranger purchaser cannot be allowed to come into joint
possession with the other co-sharers ... more or less admitted by the parties. The defendants are the stranger
purchasers of a joint property belonging to the members of the undivided Hindu
brought the suit for
partition was himself not the stranger purchaser, but one who was a
member of the family and when is seeking ... from the co-owner alienating his share in favour of a stranger
purchaser and when such a vendee was himself a party to the suit
Partition Act. According to Mr.
Mohanty, when a stranger purchaser files a suit for partition, then only
the relief under Sec.4 of the Partition ... Alekha
Mantri (supra) is held to take the view that a stranger purchaser who
does not move for partition of joint property against the remaining
plaintiffs have sold some portions of the suit
property to a stranger purchaser.
Selling of some portion of the suit premises to the stranger purchaser ... least one vacant godown was transferred in favour of a stranger purchaser.
According to him that godown could have been used by the plaintiff
thereof with any stranger as he was apprehending that the developer will sell
the said flat and the garage to stranger purchaser.
After filing ... respondent (developer) succeeds in trans-ferring the suit flat
to any stranger purchaser during the pendency of the suit, the Court may not be
able
execution of a decree,
the properties are purchased by
a bona fide purchaser who is a
stranger to the court
proceedings, the sale ... bona fide
purchaser of the property at an
auction sale and a decree holder
purchaser at a court auction. The
strangers to the decree
plaintiff but will sell the suit property to the stranger purchaser. The
instant suit for specific performance of contract was founded on this causes
purchased a demarcated land from the plaintiff no.2 and they
are going to raise construction within the demarcated land which they have
purchased from ... land by one of the co-sharers in
favour of a stranger purchaser. By purchasing any interest in the joint property,
the defendants/respondents
trying to
transfer her share in the suit property to a stranger purchaser.
Having regard to the fact that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction
