Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 321 (1.20 seconds)

Indirani vs Saraswathy

claiming for possession of that share. So long as the stranger/purchaser does not seek actual division and possession, either in the suit ... property in I.A.No.932 of 2007. Therefore, when the stranger purchaser also joined in the final decree application and prayed for partition

Mrs. H.Uma Maheswari vs K.Govindaswamy

legal basis on which, the right could be enforced against the stranger purchaser. When interpreting the section, one can properly assume that Parliament ... said that it runs with the land and binds the stranger purchaser. As I read Section 22 , Parliament must have had in mind
Madras High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - P T Asha - Full Document

Mrs. H.Uma Maheswari vs K.Govindaswamy

legal basis on which, the right could be enforced against the stranger purchaser. When interpreting the section, one can properly assume that Parliament ... said that it runs with the land and binds the stranger purchaser. As I read Section 22 , Parliament must have had in mind
Madras High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - P T Asha - Full Document

Kaliyammal vs Valliammal

that the appellants’ possession deserved protection against interference by the purchasers/strangers. 12.It is also argued that even assuming an undivided interest, the purchasers ... They cannot be treated as strangers or trespassers. Whether the sale exceeds the vendor’s share or whether the purchasers are bona fide or otherwise
Madras High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next