right to contest the suit. Moreover, they are not strangers to the suit property or purchasers of the property. Having allowed the order passed ... defendants 2 8 that they are not strangers to the suit property or purchasers of the property; that they are none other than the family
Jayaprakash vs Nandhakumar
Author: R.Subbiah
Bench: R.Subbiah
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
Jayaprakash vs Nandhakumar
Author: R.Subbiah
Bench: R.Subbiah
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
subsequent
purchaser/third party/proposed fourth defendant is not a bona-fide purchaser
without notice. At no point of time, the subsequent purchaser tried ... appellant/plaintiff that the third party, who
is the subsequent purchaser, is a stranger to the contract in the specific performance
suit and impleading
right to contest the suit. Moreover, they
are not strangers to the suit property or purchasers of the property. Having
allowed the order passed ... defendants 2 – 8 that they are not strangers to the suit
property or purchasers of the property; that they are none other than the
family
P-4 S.V.R. Renuka Devi All Are Residing ... vs R-1 S.V
conveyed and assigned to the first purchaser (mother) for her life with remainder over to the second purchaser (first defendant) with absolute powers of disposal ... first defendant/first respondent was incorporated therein as a co-purchaser or second purchaser at the suggestion of the father of the plaintiff and defendants
interest or possession over the suit property and they are only strangers to the suit property. The plaintiffs have no locus standi ... father in law of Defendant No.14 viz., Ponnapillai @ Perumal purchased the suit property from one Kalappa Naidu under a deed of sale registered
extent of 2.74 acres out of 10.96 acres, had been purchased by A.Veeraraghava Iyengar from one of the co-sharers of Rama Reddy ... appellant would not convey any title and hence, the appellant is the stranger to the property and treating him as an obstructor does not arise
part thereof. Since the registration is a notice to the subsequent purchaser, it cannot be said that registration is a notice to the co-owner ... ouster will not arise. Only if the property is sold to a stranger to the knowledge of other co-owner and in spite of that
