bile leak with biloma formation and (2) biliary obstruction
caused by stricture formation. Patients may present with pain and fever from a
biloma or jaundice ... segmental right
duct, is a common cause of bile duct transection. Strictures tend to occur in
the common hepatic duct owing to thermal injury
trial court in an appeal before it, had
passed severe strictures against the trial court at several places and, in
substance, had suggested that ... judgment held that the High Court was not
justified in passing the strictures against the trial Judge. The Bench
observed that judicial experience shows that
bile leak with biloma formation and (2) biliary
obstruction caused by stricture formation.
Patients may present with pain and fever from a biloma
of jaundice ... segmental right duct, is a
common cause of bile duct transection.
Strictures tend to occur in the common hepatic duct owing to thermal
injury
that the court may not be justified in making adverse
remarks/passing strictures against a person unless it
is necessary for the disposal ... view, the High Court was not justified and
correct in passing observations/strictures against appellants 2
& 3 without affording an opportunity of being heard
report, not only gave an adverse report but also pointed out certain strictures passed by him in the judicial order. Further, it has also been ... submitted by the District & Sessions Judge, the District Authority and the stricture passed by Shri Vinod Kumar Srivastava, Additional District Judge, Court
petitioner.
Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi PP for the State.
Aggrieved by certain strictures passed by this
court in judgment dated 12.03.2010, the petitioner, a
judicial officer ... prayer that the
observations made by the learned Judge, which
tantamount to strictures against him, should be expunged.
3
Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, the learned Public
Appeal
No.42/2006, wherein, as per learned counsel for the petitioner,
stricture has been passed against the petitioner, who was the
Investigating Officer involved ... that the observations made in the said
Para amounts to passing of stricture against the petitioner and since
the said stricture was passed without hearing
report given by
OP/appellants no.2, 3 & 4 the stricture was shown in the left
Colon showing difference of opinion in both ... opinion in
between the reports yet the existence of growth of stricture was
present and therefore, operation should be got conducted. The
complainant was therefore
report given by
OP/appellants no.2, 3 & 4 the stricture was shown in the left
Colon showing difference of opinion in both ... opinion in
between the reports yet the existence of growth of stricture was
present and therefore, operation should be got conducted. The
complainant was therefore
State vs . on 18 April, 2012
IN THE COURT OF SH. RAKESH TEWARI ASJVI
