joint with them. The suit property was not the 'Stridhana' property of Balavva and therefore he did not inherit it from his mother ... They read as follows :-
(2) Whether the suit lands were the Stridhana of deceased Balavva w/o Dodbasappa and she was full owner and possessor
gave away the suit 2nd item to his daughter Ayyammal as a stridhana property. Since then the suit 2nd item was in enjoyment of Ayyammal ... regard to item 2 that the said properties have been given as stridhana properties to Ayyammal is erroneous in the light of the clinching evidence
Saroja-D7 are daughters of Chinnakannu Ammal and Parvatha konar. Whileso, the stridhana property given to Chinnakannu Ammal under the deed dated 12.4.1946 admeasuring ... daughters, namely, D4-Vengammal and D7-Saroja. Only after the stridhana property of Chinnakannu Ammal was divided into two equal shares and allotted to Vengammal
under:
45 OS No.5985/1988
"(A) Hindu Law - Succession - Stridhana -
Term "daughter" includes an illegitimate
daughter - Legitimate son cannot exclude ... well as decided
cases have clearly laid down that
succession to stridhana property is quite
different and distinct from succession to
the property
explained that this
gift of land was in the nature of 'Stridhana' given to the bride by the
father for her maintenance.
After ... gift of five acres of land to the deceased as her
"Stridhana" called in the community as pasunukumkuma. As promised and
declared
four days before her death, Jaggo Bai executed a
will, bequeathing her Stridhana property to her son Beni
Chand's second wife Kamla Kunwar ... moiety in Jaggo Bai's estate, which was her
Stridhana property. Ratan Lal gets nothing under the will
of his grand-mother Jaggo
next contended that she inherited the same from her mother as Stridhana property.
(viii) As against this inconsistent case if the case of the third ... addition to her title as heir of her mother's stridhana house, my client has been in open absolute exclusive possession as of right
purchase had been contributed by his wife Nagamma out of her stridhana. It was therefore submitted that the property for apportionment was only one-half ... therefore clear that consideration did come from another source namely the stridhana of the wife. As far as the legal position is concerned, the learned
appellants that there
are no allegations in the complaint that the
'stridhana articles' were given to appellants 2
to 6 and that they ... paid the dowry amount "to the
accused and some 'stridhana articles' like
double cot and other furniture and utensils
required
jewels of the petitioner's wife, were part of the 'stridhana' given to her at the
time of her marriage with ... that his wife had sold her jewels, which were
given as 'stridhana', however, the sale of jewels is later in point of time
