Therefore, the City Municipal Council was the appropriate
authority to deal with change of land use. It is also pointed
out that the petitioner - association ... buildings. Thus, even as many of the houses may have
been structurally changed, necessary actions have to be
taken by the appropriate authority, including respondent
Dr Smt Mangala Shridhar vs The Karnataka Governor'S on 23 September, 2014
Equivalent
would be required to bring about major changes in
respect of the following matters :
(a) Management structure
(b) Fee fixation
(c) Student admissions ... clear that it would require the
petitioners to change their management structure, the fixation of
fees would be out of their hands, student selection
property.......
4. The 1937 Act seeks to make
fundamental changes in the concept of a
copacenary and the rights of members of
the family ... time of his death has
introduced changes which are alien to the
structure of a coparcenary. The interest of
the widow arises not by inheritance
held that the proposed amendment does not change the
basic structure of the suit but only a change in the nature
of relief claimed
Maharashtra. It changed its name to "Wipro Products
Limited" in the year 1977. The Transferee company subsequently
changed its name to "Wipro ... Transferee Company under the scheme and there will be no
change in the capital structure of the Transferee Company under
the Scheme of amalgamation. Hence
converted into a public
3
limited company and its name was changed to "Azim Premji
Custodial Services Limited" and thereafter to "Wipro ... issued by the
Transferee Company and there would be no change in the capital
structure. It is therefore stated that the Transferee has not filed
categorical finding that addendum shows
that changes to the original show-cause notice do not
structurally alter the show-case notice. Whatever is
alleged
undergone
sufficient change, as submitted by the learned Counsel
for the defendants, photographs could have been
produced to depict the present structure ... therefore, the defendants have
become the owners of the super structure. It is in this
regard, it is argued that plaintiffs cannot have the
vacant
improvement to the structure and the fact that they
did not object to her obtaining transfer of khatha and
change in revenue records
