this case for which no board resolution was required. No
structural changes have been made by the respondents and for renovation ... residential area where commercial
use is prohibited, if no structural change is made or is intended to be made in
the tenanted premises and there
building to carry on the business
properly, without making any structural changes, moreover,
the appellant company was not the owner of the said property ... appellant company was not
allowed to carry on any major structural changes in the said
property.
2.2 That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals
through
his letter dated 26.9.2006 informing the defendant
association that no structural change is involved in the repair
cum maintenance work and the carried ... neither can come to the
conclusion as to what is a structural change or alteration or
modification and how it differs from repair/maintenance
work
take inspection. Opponent submitted that complainants have
carried out major structural changes in their flats after taking possession of
the flats and amalgamated both ... Municipal Corporation. They
submitted that at that time complainants have made structural changes and
removed internal load bearing wall. They submitted that because of this
occupied the
suit premises but also carried out illegal and unauthorisedly
structural changes by constructing a mezzanine floor in the suit
premises. In paragraph ... occupying unauthorisedly the suit
premises, also carried out illegal and unauthorized structural
changes by constructing mezzanine floor in the premises.
(iv) Sevakram and Corporation
occupied the
suit premises but also carried out illegal and unauthorisedly
structural changes by constructing a mezzanine floor in the suit
premises. In paragraph ... occupying unauthorisedly the suit
premises, also carried out illegal and unauthorized structural
changes by constructing mezzanine floor in the premises.
(iv) Sevakram and Corporation
very inception of tenancy. The plaintiffs were not making any
structural change in the suit property and were only repairing an already
Suit No. 594633 ... Mohd. Yusuf 6/17
the plaintiffs were trying to make structural changes in the suit property and that
the same was impermissible. The defendants further
allottee, or such minor changes or alterations as may be necessary due to architectural and structural reasons duly recommended and verified by an authorised Architect ... change including an addition to the area or change in height, or the removal of part of a building, or any change to the structure
which are extracted below:
“26. Where the Constitution has conceived a particular
structure on certain institutions, the legislative bodies are
bound to mould the statutes ... legislative body concerned does
not carry out the required structural changes in the statutes,
then, it is the duty of the court to provide
building or land or any material or
structural change in any heritage building or its
precinct and includes demolition of any existing
building, structure
