plaintiff/respondents came to know that defendants/appellants carried
out some structural change and they asked the defendants to stop their
work. The appellants/defendants ... staircase
connecting ground floor with first floor and thereby making any
structural change and for a further order of injunction restraining them
from using
premises.
Landlord Baljit Singh Jeji (AW4) claims that these structural changes in the
premises were effected from 6th June to 5th July. Even Building Expert ... month or so must have been taken in carrying out these
structural changes.
20. So far as the second question is concerned, plea
suit for
permanent injunction to restrain the defendant from making any
structural changes in the entry gate measuring 11.5 feet shown ... defendant no. 1 at present has no intention to make any structural
change in the entry gate. Rest of the case of the plaintiff
also averred by the petitioner that respondent has done
structural changes in the tenanted premises without the consent of the
landlord, which is objectionable ... month. Further, respondent has denied to have made any
structural changes in the demised premises. Further, it is stated that reply
to legal notice dated
threatened the
plaintiff to make the addition, alteration and structural changes in the
aforesaid property without getting the property partitioned. It has been
further stated ... restrained from carrying out any
addition, alteration and structural changes in the said property till the
decision of the present suit.
3. In the reply
respondent
under the appellant with the adjoining premises by making structural
changes and by removal of load bearing walls dividing/demarcating the
property ... appellant from the other adjoining properties;
(d) that the structural changes being carried out by the respondent had
even caused cracks on the second floor
misuse of
the premises continued despite notice. Moreover the unauthorized
structural changes were also added upon by the respondent. It is
denied that the petition ... used
for the said purpose till date and there has been no change in the user
of the premises till date as the same
effect that there were no addition or alteration or
structural changes to be seen from the photographs. On the main premises that there ... addition or alteration as such had been carried out and no structural
changes had either been made or were intended to be made
restraining the defendants from carrying out
any additions or alterations or structural changes in the suit
property.
3. In reply to the present suit, defendants ... over the suit property and that the defendants
are causing permanent structural changes in the suit
property. Hence, it has been submitted on behalf
restraining the defendants from carrying out any additions or
alterations or structural changes in the suit property.
3. In reply to the present suit, defendants ... over the suit property and that the defendants
are causing permanent structural changes in the suit
property. Hence, it has been submitted on behalf
