extra work; (iv) Rs. 1,00,000/- for appreciation of revised structural drawing by Nirmalaya Chatterjee; (v) Rs. 66,440/- for sanctioning of building plan ... test they recommended shallow foundation for which the respondent had to change the structural design again with the appellant's consent and the appellant
maintainable. This witness further stated that there is changes in
design and structure by government of Punjab and GMADA and the
project in question
bills. He applied for load reduction in view of changes made in power tariff structure for small industrial consumers. It was also decided
habitable and remove all
the defects in the building structure and make all the necessary changes to
reinstate it as per the sanctioned layout plan ... specifically
mentioned that the project developers reserved the right to change any
specification of alleviation indicated in the brochure. The complainant
obtained
plans and not
to modify the plans or change the building structure and layout. It was
4
further prayed that opponents jointly and severally
signed by the complainant to the effect that he wanted
some changes in the flat and gave this writing duly attested by the
notary public ... account of delay, as
complainant himself sought the alterations in the structure of the flat.
The counsel for OP further argued that complainant wrote letter
structure detailed in Rule 9 or 10, (3) drainage plans detailed in rule
11 and (4) the specification detailed in rule 12. Any change
chittaks and 35 sq. ft. more or less together with standing structure lying and situated at Premises No.8/28, Sahid Nagar, P.S.- Kasba ... between the complainant and OP No.1 on 15.06.2012 whereby the necessary changes regarding allocation has been made to the effect that the complainant
Col. Gurcharan Singh Virdi vs M/S Ats Infrasturcture Ltd. on 13 March, 2018
Daily
Mani Ram Garg vs Greater Mohali Area Development ... on 12 January, 2018
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES
