Smt. Nisha Kumari vs State Of U.P. & Others on 23 May, 2014
Bench
dated 7.6.2006 passed by Consolidation Officer and maintained the earlier sub-division of plot No. 151. Against the appellate order dated 27.7.2007, respondent ... respondent nos. 2/1 to 2/3 submitted that sub-division of plot No. 151 was not rightly made accordingly Consolidation Officer has exercised
competent authority to sub-divide the aforesaid plot in six (6) parts in the following manner;
Sub division of the plot No.SC-01 Sector ... held on 26.07.2021, wherein it was resolved that no further sub division of plots in the sports city would be carried out, and further
indemnified the authority through sub-lease deed against non-completion of the project.
37. The sub-division of the plot was not done on accord ... money by selling the companies incorporated by the promoters.
57. The division, sub division of sports city was a part of the nefarious design
competent authority to sub-divide the aforesaid plot in six (6) parts in the following manner;
Sub division of the plot No.SC-01 Sector ... Lessee of the sub divided plot No.SC-01/D Sector-79 admeasuring 1,00,000 Sqm. has requested for sub division of the said
indemnified the authority through sub-lease deed against non-completion of the project.
22. The sub-division of the plot was not done on accord ... money by selling the companies incorporated by the promoters.
41. The division, sub division of sports city was a part of the nefarious design
parties in respect to the aforementioned plot. The aforementioned plot No. 128 was divided in five sub divisions. The particular of the same ... Court has also failed to consider the aforesaid entry of sub-division of plot No. 128 which was made due to fraud and collusion
member of the Consortium, on 04.04.2011, requested the UPSIDC for sub-division of the Plot No. BGH-A into two parts measuring ... plot " BGHA1" in favour of the petitioner, who proposed to solely develop the project on the demarcated plot. Thus, the sub-division
plot no.903/1 did not lie in plot no. 1170. It again showed that there were as many as eleven sub-divisions of plot ... plot, the present plot no.1170/2 was carved out. It has been argued that there were as many as 11 sub-divisions of plot
made at the bar, it transpires that it is not disputed that plot of the petitioner is not subject matter of the E tender notice ... learned counsel for the petitioner is that the various plots and sub divisions of plot no.7415 etc. have not been demarcated on the spot