that Applicant had an intention and/or knowledge
in receiving sub-standard quality of goods and therefore, there are ingredients of
offence under Section ... sub standard quality goods from Accused Nos. 1 and 2 or not, and/or whether
the goods in question were of sub standard quality
defective quality of the goods within reasonable time and
requested them to supply the assured quality goods and to
replace the sub-standard goods delivered ... poor or sub-standard quality, or that the defendant
had raised any such grievance or complaint regarding poor
quality of goods either within reasonable time
debt or liability.
So far as the issuance of substandard quality of goods is concerned,
Ld. Counsel for the accused has argued that accused ... acceptance of goods and now it is upon the complainant to prove
that the goods supplied were not of substandard quality. Moreover
debt or liability.
So far as the issuance of substandard quality of goods is concerned,
Ld. Counsel for the accused has argued that accused ... acceptance of goods and now it is upon the complainant to prove
that the goods supplied were not of substandard quality. Moreover
debt or liability.
So far as the issuance of substandard quality of goods is concerned,
Ld. Counsel for the accused has argued that accused ... goods and now it is upon the complainant to prove
Case No.249/1
that the goods supplied were not of substandard quality. Moreover
said property as the accused
never used the sub-standard quality goods in the construction of the said property. It
is further stated ... during whole cross-examination,
the complainant failed to show what sub-standard quality goods were used by the
accused for which she alleged that
said property as the accused
never used the sub-standard quality goods in the construction of the said property. It
is further stated ... during whole cross-examination,
the complainant failed to show what sub-standard quality goods were used by the
accused for which she alleged that
good quality of material to
the defendant strictly as per its orders and specifications and in
case of any sub-standard inferior/quality goods ... returned back to plaintiff. The plaintiff on various
occasions supplied sub-standard/inferior quality goods to the
defendant. It is further mentioned that
The Madurai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1971
TAMILNADU
India
The Madurai City Municipal Corporation Act
received by the Corporation at the depots and to verify the quality of goods in
conformity with the specifications given by the Head Office ... responsible officer of the
Corporation by accepting sub-standard quality goods in collusion with suppliers
for undue pecuniary benefits. The termination Orders were upheld
