that the aforesaid judgments would be hit by the principle of sub-silentio and per incurium keeping in view the judgments of the Apex Court ... prece- dents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. A decision passed sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come
prece- dents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. A decision passed sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come ... Kaur , [1989] 1 SCC 101. The Bench held that, 'prece- dents sub-silentio and without argument are of no moment'. The Courts thus
question, the decision cannot be said to be binding and precedents sub silentio and without arguments are of no moment.
In State ... precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. "A decision passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come
precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. "A decision passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come ... Gurnam Kaur . (1989) 1 SCO 101. The bench held that, 'precedents sub-silentio and without argument are of no moment'. The Courts thus
Ruksar Khan vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 8 July, 2020
Equivalent
dealt with the issue in the light of the rule of sub-silentio. The question posed was: can the decision of an appellate court ... held that the rule of sub-silentio, is an exception to the rule of precedents. "A decision passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense
petitioner's case. The decision in the aforesaid judgment is sub silentio on the point whether in case of fraud where facts were admitted ... precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. 'a decision passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that hs come
rule of precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. A decision passed sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come ... 0323/1988 : AIR 1989 SC, 38. The Bench held that, 'precedents sub-silentio and without argument are of no moment'. The Courts thus
precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. "A decision passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come ... Corporation of Delhi v. Gurnam Kaur . The Bench held that, 'precedents sub-silentio and without argument are of no moment.' The Courts thus
dealt with the issue in the light of the rule of sub-silentio. The question posed was: can the decision of an Appellate Court ... held that the rule of sub-silentio, is an exception to the rule of precedents. "A decision passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense
