Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Kiran Lohia vs State & Ors. on 7 January, 2020 Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2020 DEL

rule of precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. A decision passed sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come ... Delhi v. Gurnam Kaur AIR1989SC38 . The Bench held that, 'precedents sub-silentio and without argument are of no moment'. The Courts thus have

U.S.Pandey President Of W.A.S. vs Uoi & Ors. on 8 October

rule of precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. ―A decision passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come ... Gurnam Kaur . [(1989) 1 SCC 101] The bench held that, ‗precedents sub-silentio and without argument are of no moment'. The courts thus have

court or present to its mind, the decision passes of as sub-silentio and has no precedentary value. The relevant portion of the said judgment ... precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. "A decision passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come

precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. "A decision passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come ... Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Gurnam Kaur . The bench held that, „precedents sub-silentio and without arguments are of no moment‟. The courts thus have

precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. "A decision passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come ... Corporation of Delhi Vs. Gurnam Kaur . The bench held that, 'precedents sub-silentio and without argument are of no moment'. The courts thus

case besides being against law. The said judgement has been passed sub-silentio and is per-incuriam as it was passed in ignorance ... judgement which is per incuriam i.e. against the statutory provisions or sub-silentio, i.e., in ignorance of some legal provisions would not operate

precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. "A decision passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come ... Corporation of Delhi v. Gurnam Kaur . The bench held that, 'precedents sub-silentio and without arguments are of no moment'. The courts thus

submissions of „forum conveniens‟. To that extent, the aforesaid orders are sub silentio. The Supreme Court in State of U.P. and Another vs. Synthetics ... precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. "A decision passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come