judgment in Sachin Nikam 's case is also sub-silentio on this ground. In support of his contention that "punishable" means ... precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. " A decision passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come
said judgment were per incuriam and suffer from vice of sub-silentio decision. In support of this contention, the learned counsel relied upon the decisions ... precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. "A decision passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come
Dr. Sameer Anant Deshpande vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 14 September, 2001
sub-silentio".
14. In fact the observations of the Supreme Court do not even fall under the category of a precedent "sub-silentio ... decision is given without pronouncing on the point, the point passes sub-silentio. (See Salmond or Jurisprudence, 12th Ed. P. 27). The decision will
point B. Point B is said to pass sub silentio."
The rule that a precedent sub-silentio is not authorities goes
back at least ... said: " An hundred precedents
sub silentio are not material" ; and Twisden, J. agreed :
"Precedents sub silentio and without argument
rule of precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. A decision passed sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come ... Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Gurnam Kaurt . The Bench held that, precedents sub-silentio and without argument are of no moment The Courts thus have
precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. "A decision
passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come ... Corporation of Delhi v.
Gurnam Kaur. The bench held that, 'precedents sub-silentio and
without argument are of no moment'. The courts thus
precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. "A decision
passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come ... Corporation of Delhi v.
Gurnam Kaur. The bench held that, 'precedents sub-silentio and
without argument are of no moment'. The courts thus
precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. "A decision
passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come ... Corporation of Delhi v.
Gurnam Kaur. The bench held that, 'precedents sub-silentio and
without argument are of no moment'. The courts thus
precedents. It has been explained as rule of sub-silentio. "A decision
passes sub-silentio, in the technical sense that has come ... Corporation of Delhi v.
Gurnam Kaur. The bench held that, 'precedents sub-silentio and
without argument are of no moment'. The courts thus
