second respondent's proceeding dated 26.10.2004, the subject roaster should have been followed by the management viz., Maths, Science and English and the petitioner ... management having not followed the subject roaster, the proposal for approval are returned for which the petitioner management submitted a reply on 19.7.2006 before
second respondent's proceeding dated 26.10.2004, the
subject roaster should have been followed by the management viz., Maths, Science
and English and the petitioner ... management having not followed the subject
roaster, the proposal for approval are returned for which the petitioner
management submitted a reply on 19.7.2006 before
directed the management to fill up the vacant
posts by subject roaster without ascertaining the real need of
the school with regard to the subject ... posts are sanctioned,
the second respondent is justified in giving a subject roaster
to fill up the posts, but cannot insist the Schools, where
teachers
directed the management to fill up the vacant
posts by subject roaster without ascertaining the real need of
the school with regard to the subject ... posts are sanctioned,
the second respondent is justified in giving a subject roaster
to fill up the posts, but cannot insist the Schools, where
teachers
Subjects was
relaxed and it was made open to other subjects as well and this Court has
held in several cases imposing subject Roaster ... restriction of subject roster in
English, Science and Maths subjects was relaxed and it was made open to
other subjects also depending upon the need
post of Secondary Grade
Teacher, the School should have followed Subject Roaster is
concerned, that issue has been settled in a number of cases ... appearing for the respondents, would submit that, with regard to the
Subject Roaster, number of judgments have been passed by this
Court. Insofar
dated
29.08.2006 returned the proposal on the ground that the subject roaster has not
been followed as per G.O.Ms.No.100 dated ... said decision, earlier decisions were followed
and ultimately held that the subject roaster is not applicable to the aided
schools. Therefore, it is contended that
directed the management to fill
up the vacant posts by subject roaster without ascertaining the real
need of the school with regard to the subject ... posts are sanctioned, the second
respondent is justified in giving a subject roaster to fill up the posts,
but cannot insist the Schools, where teachers
directed the
management to fill up the vacant posts by subject
roaster without ascertaining the real need of the
school with regard to the subject ... posts are sanctioned, the second respondent
is justified in giving a subject roaster to fill up the
posts, but cannot insist the Schools, where
teachers
dated
31.07.2023 has rejected the said approval on the ground that subject
roaster has not been followed and the 4th respondent corporate
management is having ... also not been stated which other subject teacher
should have been appointed as per the subject roaster, if at all the said
subject roaster
