dated
31.07.2023 has rejected the said approval on the ground that subject
roaster has not been followed and the 4th respondent corporate
management is having ... also not been stated which other subject teacher
should have been appointed as per the subject roaster, if at all the said
subject roaster
directions given in G.O.Ms.No.100 by following subject
roaster. In the present case, the school has not been upgraded the said posts
directions given in G.O.Ms.No.100 by following subject
roaster. In the present case, the school has not been upgraded the said posts
which
was filed by the petitioner's previous incumbent and subject roaster
system in BT Assistant post cannot be insisted to a minority aided ... whether the Minority Institution
can be compelled to follow a subject roaster
without there being appropriate amendment to the
relevant Rules. This issue was considered
permit the appointment of teachers when there are
surplus.
(vii) The subject roaster has not been followed.
3. The reasons cited in the impugned order
hereby directed to list CWJC No.19205
of 2018 before the roaster bench, subject to payment of cost of
Rs.2,000/- (two thousand). Cost
Pradesh. Vide order
dated 29.06.2010, the Government granted the approval subject to
following the roaster system.
3.1. The respondents have further submitted that for promotion
parties request that the contempt be
placed before the Roaster Bench.
9. Subject to the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice, list
same will be decided expeditiously within the time as stipulated subject to any roaster maintained therein.
Order Date :- 27.1.2023
Puspendra
length by the learned Co-
ordinate Bench, having earlier roaster over the subject, where
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1126
