Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

restrictions imposed on sub-letting, the cases where a written contract of subletting or tangible evidence of payment is forthcoming would

statutory tenant, whose contractual tenancy did not specifically authorise him to sublet or grant lease, could not create a valid licence before coming into operation ... said Act applied to contracts also as these would fall under the provisions of the law relating to contracts. It was further held that

statute specifically provides that a contract contrary to the provisions of the statute would be void the contract would remain binding between the parties ... specific provision of a statute declaring subletting unlawful, the provision of the statute shall prevail over the contract. 48. In Shrikrishna Khanna Vs. Additional District

entiled to sublet the suit premises. In view of these facts, it cannot be said that the tenant has unlawfully sublet the suit premises ... contract to any contract to the contrary, it shall not be lawful after the coming into operation of this Act for any tenant to sublet

Copy subletting; second, the occupiers had no privity of contract with the Owner; third, no subletting had been ratified by the Owner; four, the Executing ... their possession through the original tenant. So there was no privity of contract between the landlord and the respondents. In that context, Balvant N. Viswamitra

Copy subletting; second, the occupiers had no privity of contract with the Owner; third, no subletting had been ratified by the Owner; four, the Executing ... their possession through the original tenant. So there was no privity of contract between the landlord and the respondents. In that context, Balvant N. Viswamitra

lease deed in favour of Shankar Godaji Gore specifically enabled him to sublet. Under the lease deed dated July 7, 1948, Awate the original owner ... that too, subject to the contract to the contrary. Here is a case of a contrary contract. Under these circumstances the ruling reported in Sardar

land and thereafter to sublet or sublease those flats under the terms and conditions of the contract agreement. Under the facts and circumstances

proceedings, and thereafter to original plaintiff no. 2. However, a written contract was entered into and with the consent of Page 2 of 33 Downloaded ... 17185/2012 CAV JUDGMENT the landlord, the property in question was sublet to respondent no. 2, who is original defendant no. 2, namely

privity of contract between the respondent and the sub-lessees. Hence, they have to be evicted on the ground of subletting. 4.3.The petitioners