Subramanium Sethuraman vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 17 September, 2004
Equivalent citations: AIR 2004 SUPREME COURT ... Sinha , Tarun Chatterjee
CASE NO.:
Appeal (crl.) 1253 of 2002
PETITIONER:
Subramanium Sethuraman
RESPONDENT:
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
DATE OF JUDGMENT
have the power to recall process. In the case of Subramanium Sethuraman, the observations in the case of Adalat Prasad, have been quoted ... line in paragraph 16 of Adalat Prasad or even Subramanium Sethuraman cannot be divorced from the context of the question under consideration and treated
Adalat Prasad Vs. Roop Lal Jindal ( 2004) 7 SCC
338 and Subramanium Sethuraman Vs. State of
Maharashtra 2005 SCC (Crl.) 242. The counsel further ... Supreme Court's decision in the
case of Subramanium Sethuraman (supra),
there is no question of discharge under Chapter
XX insofar
have the power to recall process. In the case of Subramanium Sethuraman, the observations in the case of Adalat Prasad, have been quoted ... line in paragraph 16 of Adalat Prasad or even Subramanium Sethuraman cannot be divorced from the context of the question under consideration and treated
have the power to recall process. In the case of Subramanium Sethuraman, the observations in the case of Adalat Prasad have been quoted ... line in paragraph 16 of Adalat Prasad or even Subramanium Sethuraman cannot be divorced from the context of the question under consideration and treated
places
reliance on said Adalath Prasad supra that was followed in Subramanium
Sethuraman Vs. State of Maharashtra (three judge Bench) where it was
held ... referring to the three
judge bench expression in Adalath Prasad and Subramanium
Sethuraman(supra), the Court arrived the said conclusion it was no doubt
upon the decision of the Hon'ble Apex
Court in Subramanium Sethuraman vs State
of Maharashtra & Anr (Coram: 3 JJ)3,
wherein ... same is dismissed."
13.15. Relying on the decision in Subramanium
Sethuraman 's case, he submits that there is
no power with
upon the decision of the Hon'ble Apex
Court in Subramanium Sethuraman vs State
of Maharashtra & Anr (Coram: 3 JJ)3,
wherein ... same is dismissed."
13.15. Relying on the decision in Subramanium
Sethuraman 's case, he submits that there is
no power with
Criminal Revision Case No. 765/2019, while relying on
Subramanium Sethuraman (supra) held that since the offences are
triable as per summons procedure ... VAISHALI PRUTHI
Signing Date:04.11.2025
19:05:20
Prasad and Subramanium Sethuraman have interpreted the law
correctly. The relevant paragraphs read thus
2019 05:06:33 :::
Cri. WP-1727-2017.doc
i) Subramanium Sethuraman Vs. State of
Maharashtra and Anr.3
ii) Lata Pramod Dave ... complainant before the
Apex Court, in the case of Subramanium Sethuraman (Supra) was
that the case in hand was triable as a summons case
