which reads as follows:
"While it is true that in Subramanium Sethuraman v.
State of Maharashtra this Court observed that once the plea ... issuance of process. As
held in Adalat Prasad (supra) and Subramanium Sethuraman (supra),
the Magistrate is deluded with the power to revisit the order
Magistrate. Additionally, the Hon'ble
Supreme Court of India in Subramanium Sethuraman vs State of
Maharastra & Anr. Appeal (Crl.) No. 1253/2002 ... judgments of this Court in
Adalat Prasad (supra) and Subramanium Sethuraman
(supra) would show that they do not warrant any
reconsideration. The Trial Court
Roop Lal Jindal and Ors. ( 2004) 7 SCC 338 and Subramanium
Sethuraman Vs. State of MAharasthra and Anr. (2004) 13 SCC
324 have interpreted ... This section again came into interpretation before in case titled
Subramanium Sethuraman v. State of Maharashtra , (2004) 13 SCC 324
as under
basis of mere averments.
It was held in Subramanium Sethuraman vs State of
Maharashtra & Anr on 17th September, 2004 that:
Discharge, Review, Reconsideration ... same and pass appropriate order, is contrary to law.
9. In Subramanium Sethuraman Vs. State of Maharashtra
and Anr., Appeal
Judges Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in
Subramanium Sethuraman vs State of Maharastra & Anr. (2004),
reaffirmed the decision given ... record. Therefore, at this stage, the judgment of Apex
Court in Subramanium Sethuraman vs State of Maharastra & Anr.
(2004) has to be followed
transaction.
6) Judgments of this Court in Adalat Prasad (supra) and
Subramanium Sethuraman (supra) have interpreted the law
correctly and we reiterate that there
reiterated the legal
position which was explained in the case of Subramanium Sethuraman v
State of Maharashtra & Ors.5 and in Adalat Prasad
transaction.
6) Judgments of this Court in Adalat Prasad (supra)
and Subramanium Sethuraman (supra) have interpreted the
law correctly and we reiterate that there
transaction.
6) Judgments of this Court in Adalat Prasad (supra)
and Subramanium Sethuraman (supra) have interpreted
the law correctly and we reiterate that there
decided by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of
Subramanium Sethuraman v. State of Maharashtra 1, therefore,
order impugned dated 22.05.2020 passed
