Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 473 (0.08 seconds)

Madhu Bala vs State on 26 June, 2023

that the defence taken by the appellant of "grave and sudden provocation" which is an exception under Section 300 IPC must not only ... extreme anger. It was submitted that there was no "sudden provocation" in the instant case and furthermore, as per the version of deceased
Delhi High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - M Gupta - Full Document

Jitan Bora vs The State on 18 March, 2026

provocation is not given by anything done in the lawful exercise of the right of private defence. Explanation.--Whether the provocation was grave and sudden ... deceased must have given provocation to the accused; (b) the provocation must be grave; (c) the provocation must be sudden; (d) the offender
Delhi High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - N Chawla - Full Document

Manga Ram vs State on 14 February, 2025

clearly indicates that his actions were a result of sudden provocation by the deceased. As per his statement, the deceased made certain remarks concerning ... shows that the act was not a repercussion of sudden provocation but rather a premeditated one. 11. The ld. APP in conclusion submits that this
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sukhdev Singh vs State on 24 April, 2002

satisfied. (i) deceased must have given the provocation to the accused (ii) provocation must be grave and sudden (iii) the offender by virtue ... grave and sudden to the appellant/accused, he even snatched his pistol. These facts how that grave and sudden provocation in the facts
Delhi High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next