ever filed seeking restoration of the suit and hence the suit was never restored. Instant suit seeking ejectment was filed in the year 2002 after ... subsequent cause a fresh suit for ejectment can be brought. A defendant against whom an ejectment suit has been dismissed for default cannot be placed
between
the partners. A suit being Civil Suit No. 152 of 1960 was
filed for partition and in that suit defendant ... landlord or
whether or not such suit or proceeding is
pending having jurisdiction to entertain a
suit for ejectment or in the City of Madras
suit 'for possession' and a 'suit for
""._vej'eC'tment', a suit for ejectment in the context ... such a suit cannot be termed has'~._aCf_suit "for
'ejectment' and since a suit for§pos_s'esVsior1i
premises Gangabisen filed a first suit for damages but no relief was sought in that suit for ejectment of the lessee from the theatre, Subsequently ... date of suit. The suit was decreed. Then he brought a second suit for possession. It was held that the second suit was barred
merits. Since it is not a Title Suit for Possession, but only a suit for ejectment, the dismissal could only be on a ground that ... include the allowing of a suit to be dismissed for default or abandoning a suit for ejectment under Rule 1 of Order 23 and therefore
Official Trustee). In the year 1974, the Official Trustee instituted Ejectment Suit No. 1152 of 1974 against the defendant on two-fold grounds of default ... this suit. He contends that though the present parties were co-defendants in that suit, as the plaintiff there claimed ejectment, on the ground
under which the earlier suits were instituted in the Court of Small Causes. Previously, all suits for the ejectment of tenants from premises, situated within ... Small Causes was not competent to entertain the suits.
But the suits were suits for the ejectment of tenants from immoveable property situated within
specified within the time fixed, the suit, so far as it is a suit for ejectment, shall be dismissed, but if he fails ... earlier provision, stating that the type of suit contemplated was a suit in which various reliefs, including ejectment, were prayed for, it would be appropriate
Kesho Ram continued the suit. The suit was contested by the respondents principally on the ground that the suit was barred by res judicata ... suits. The decision of this point given in the earlier suit under the Tenancy Act will operate as res judicata in the later suit
time when they were previously ejected, would be liable to be ejected upon a suit being filed within two years of their reinstatement ... ejectment. But the word ejected is followed by the expression under the law. Ejected under the law would mean by means of a suit instituted
