dismissing O. S. 75 of 1973, a suit instituted by the plaintiff for declaration that the suit wall marked AB in the sketch annexed ... plaintiff, the suit wall has been described as a common wall, that all the windows in the disputed wall had been closed even during
wall and constructed to the west of FG wall and the raising of the height of the old wall and the newly added wall ... wall constructed to the north of GJ wall and in making constructions over the said newly added wall.
OS. No. 195/74: The suit
Layout Plan did not reveal any wall.
The existing wall was constructed without any authority and the suit plot was
required to be transferred ... made by the CFO,
pursuant to Suit No.225 of 2014, which records that the suit wall was in
contravention of the permission granted under
decreeing of the suit for declaration and mandatory injunction.
2. The plaintiff filed the suit for declaration declaring that the suit
wall is his exclusive ... ought to
have drawn adverse inference and decreed the suit by presuming that the suit
wall is exclusively belonging to the plaintiff since the defendant
suit 12.03.2007
Nature of the (Suit or pro-note, suit for
Declaration & Injunction
declaration and possession, suit for
Suit
injunction, etc.)
21.06.2011
Date ... wall i.e., whether
it is a compound wall or a retraining wall, but he has
described the said wall, as a compound wall.
Even
Sanjay Kumar)
Date of institution of the suit : 20.07.2018
Nature of the suit : Injunction Suit
Date of commencement of : 30.01.2024
Recording of the evidence
Date ... that defendant
demolished a portion of compound wall and
lumber shed wall on the western side of suit
schedule property?
2. Whether the plaintiff proves
area of Village Mandoli,
Shahdara, Delhi (hereinafter referred as suit property).
The suit property was allotted by Govt. of India under
20th point programme ... sale.
(VI) On 19.08.2011, D-1 had broken the behind wall of
the suit property and started raising illegal construction
due to which plaintiff made
suit against the defendant.
3. The plaintiff by way of present suit has prayed for
following reliefs:
a) a decree of possession of the suit ... that on 28.08.2013, defendant and
police official caused damage to boundary walls of suit property but
CS No. 17244/16 Santosh Sharma vs. Umesh Kumar
Dhansa, Delhi. The eastern side of wall
(herein after called as suit wall) of these houses, is one and
constructed by the plaintiff 40 years ... more about
15 years back. It is further stated that the suit wall is part of the
house of plaintiff. It is further stated that
constructed the breast
wall. He demanded cost of breast wall
from the defendant, but to no
conclusion. That suit was contested by
the defendant. However ... cost
of breast wall erected by him. For the
cost of that breast wall, he had earlier
filed civil suit No.18th August
