Director of
the company. The truck was to be released on Superdari. The matter
regarding involvement of driver of their truck was to be solved ... Court Complex, Amloh and
for release of the truck on Superdari, had made an application through a
lawyer. This application was marked to SHO, Police
that their clothes had been recovered. They got the same
released on superdari. He denied that the accused present in the court was the same ... case property was released
SC no.:57/14 Page 4/12
on superdari. The FSL report was Ex. PW7/A. He had recorded
come that the case property
i.e. gold chain was on superdari with her/PW 1. He thus contended that how
come the case property ... produced from malkhana during evidence of PW3
when it was already on superdari with PW1. Ld counsel tried to convey that the
case property shown
aforesaid Pranav Kumar
Mishra has taken the said phone on superdari. I can identify the
aforesaid mobile phone if shown ... Pranav Kumar Mishra ( fiance
of PW1 and owner of the mobile ) on superdari by Ld. Predecessor
vide order dated 28.01.2010. The photocopy of the bill
Case property was released to the complainant on
superdari. The testimony of PW1 could not be concluded for the
want of case property. The complainant ... Rajkumar & Ors. Page No. 3 of 5
was released on superdari to the complainant and the same could
not be produced in the court
same
was released to the regd. owner of the same on superdari in his
presence and he had brought the same which was exhibited ... after the recovery of said he had got the same
released on superdari by executing superdarinama Ex PW5/A and
today he had brought
told that he could get back his stereo from the court on superdari. PW 1
further deposed that he had not applied for supeprdari ... recovered and he could get the same back from the court on superdari
but he had not applied for superdari
further deposed that on 02.11.2000, he obtained his
maruti car on superdari and proved superdaginama of the same as
Ex.PW1/C. This witness ... Dinesh Goel Ex. PW4/A. The
recovered car was released on superdari to Ajay Sharma vied
Superdaginama Ex.PW4/B. He has deposed
refused to get herself identified. He took
the recovered goods on superdari from the court. He produced the
case property in court, namely, mobile phone
question and even
such vehicle was recovered and subsequently released on superdari.
In the light of such factual position, the custodial interrogation
of the petitioner
