justice where
there is no procedure specified, and thereby
occasioning failure of justice.
(4) Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the
Constitution is exercised ... failure of justice or grave injustice has
occasioned thereby, the High Court may step in to
exercise its supervisory jurisdiction.
Page
justice where there is no procedure specified, and thereby
occasioning failure of justice.
4. Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution is
exercised ... step in to
exercise its supervisory jurisdiction.
5. Be it a writ of certiorari or the exercise of supervisory jurisdiction,
none is available to correct
justice where there is no procedure specified, and thereby
occasioning failure of justice.
(4)
Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution is
exercised ... step in to exercise its supervisory jurisdiction.
(5)
Be it a writ of certiorari or the exercise of supervisory
jurisdiction, none is available to correct
justice
where there is no procedure specified, and thereby occasioning
failure of justice.
(4)
Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution is
exercised ... justice where there is no procedure specified, and thereby
occasioning failure of justice.
(4)
Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution is
exercised
unpunished. The superior departmental officials stand relieved from being charged of failure of supervisory duties etc. The Court thus unknowingly provides its shoulder
subordinate staff such failure may not
deserve criminal action. On the other hand, the failure of this nature,
will be failure to discharge their duties ... speaks of
disciplinary proceedings and not about criminal prosecution. Infact failure to do
supervisory work by itself is not a criminal act. And “wantonly failed
minor penalty charge sheet had
been imposed on the applicant for the failure of the applicant to exercise
proper, timely and effective administrative control ... contends that the Whistle Blower Protection Act
will not lie for failure of supervisory action but then Annexure-A2 seems,
on a plain reading, coming
positive case of the petitioners that due to .
failure in supervisory duty of the opposite party another employee
misappropriate the Government money and subsequently
responsibility. It is argued that the chain of command and
supervisory responsibility rested with V.K. Jain, who failed to
take appropriate action or submit ... records. The consistent retention of the files clearly indicate a
failure in supervisory duties.
Crl. Appl. No. 06/2025, Vijay Kumar Jain vs. CBI Page
failure of justice or
grave injustice has occasioned thereby, the
High Court may step in to exercise its
supervisory jurisdiction."
56. Sub-paras ... gross failure
of justice has occasioned thereby.
(6) xxx xxx
(7) The power to issue a writ of certiorari
and the supervisory jurisdiction
