amount of loss to the respondents due to the alleged
supervisory failure is to the extent of Rs.44,921 and that the Principal
offender ... Page 2 of 10
OA No.130/2015
the supervisory failure of the applicant and hence the applicant was
identified as subsidiary offender for causing
case can only be held responsible to the extent of your failure in supervisory responsibilities, training of staff working under you and control over your ... charges but has been held guilty for his failure in supervisory responsibility, training of staff working under him and also control over the staff. Referring
period
of one year which is not commensurate with alleged supervisory
failure of the applicant. Learned counsel for the respondents
clarified that, CCS (CCA) Rules
police head
constable accused of demanding a bribe.
In view of supervisory lapses, the Special Inspector General of
Police (Law & Order) sought a clarification ... report highlights issues such as internal dissatisfaction among
police ranks, procedural laxity, failure to control crime, and an overall
breakdown in law and order maintenance
admitted case of the DA is
that it was a supervisory failure. We find substance in the
submissions made by the applicant. In the order ... totally on the subordinate staff. In other words, it was
a supervisory failure. The action taken by the respondents against
the applicant
Articles of Charges against
the applicant. He has been accused of supervisory failure as well as collusion
with his subordinate resulting in misappropriation of cash
superior officer in this regard for their supervisory
11 O.A. No. 050/00230
230/2020
failure. Admittedly work of Goods shed cannot be done
land. Therefore, he has submitted that the allegation of supervisory negligence and failure to ensure the integrity and devotion to duty of his subordinates ... UPSCs advice dated 6.7.2012) that the charge of supervisory negligence and failure to ensure the integrity and devotion to duty of the subordinate staff
specific findings against the applicant holding that he was guilty of supervisory failures resulting into the commission of offences by his juniors. They submit that
report has observed as under:
"Supervision and systemic failure was there, for which every
level i.e. A.S.D.S. and Suptd. Have ... extent that control and discipline was lax and
there was supervisory failure as well as on the part of C.O.
who was superintendent
