others reported in 1989 SCC (Crl) 554 has held, thus:-
The supine indifference, slackness and callous attitude on the part of the Jail Superintendent ... That part, it is settled law that there should not be supine indifference, slackness or callous attitude in considering the representation. Any unexplained delay
apart, it is a settled law that there should not be supine indifference, slackness or callous attitude in considering the representation. Any unexplained delay
case, SCC 484, para 12)
"......there should not be any supine indifference, slackness or callous attitude in considering the representation. Any unexplained delay
dealt with. The requirement, however, is that there should not be supine indifference, slackness or callous attitude in considering the representation. Any unexplained delay
Supreme Court has held as
follows:-
"The supine indifference, slackness and callous attitude on the part of
the Jail Superintendent who had unreasonably delayed ... follows:-
?.... it is settled law that there should not be supine indifference,
slackness or callous attitude in considering the representation. Any
unexplained delay
Supreme Court has held as
follows:-
"The supine indifference, slackness and callous attitude on the part of
the Jail Superintendent who had unreasonably delayed ... follows:-
?.... it is settled law that there should not be supine indifference,
slackness or callous attitude in considering the representation. Any
unexplained delay
Detenu vs The State Of Tripura on 20 February, 2019
Author: Sanjay Karol
Bench: Sanjay
Dr. Ashfaq @ Nehal vs Union Of India & 3 Others on 13 April, 2018
Author
Dr. Ashfaq @ Nehal vs Union Of India & 3 Others on 13 April, 2018
Author
disposed of as soon as possible. There should be no supine indifference, slackness or callous attitude. Any unexplained delay would be a breach of constitutional
