petition in W.P.No.58734/2013,
petitioners deliberately and intentionally suppressed material
facts by not disclosing the earlier rounds of litigation and
dismissal ... Krishna, learned counsel for respondent/Bangalore
Development Authority that 1st petitioner suppressed
material fact of having instituted W.P.NO.37808/1997
10
before this
therefore contended that
the appellant herein was guilty of suppression of material facts
9
before the Court and had clandestinely obtained the Probate
by putting ... have
already come to the conclusion that the appellant had
suppressed material facts and had put forth untrue/false
allegations/contentions. Under these circumstances, even
under the
Passports Act, 1967 to knowingly furnish false
information or suppress material information, which
attract penal and other punishments under the acts
locus standi to prefer the
present petition, they are guilty of suppression of material facts and
have not come to Court with clean hands ... incapable of adjudication in the present petition and the
petitioners having suppressed material facts including earlier civil
and criminal litigations, disputes etc., between the parties
executed in his favour. It is contended
that the petitioner suppressed the material fact by filing an
application in this regard on 01.08.2000 stating that ... dismissed. It is
submitted that the petitioner was guilty of suppression of
material facts since one another site No. 647 situated at
Jayanagar comprising
case. It is
also submitted that the petitioners are guilty of suppression of
material fact and in view of the dismissal of the earlier petition ... mentioning about the said earlier order, clearly
tantamount to suppression of material facts and the petitioners
being guilty of abuse of process
case. It is
also submitted that the petitioners are guilty of suppression of
material fact and in view of the dismissal of the earlier petition ... mentioning about the said earlier order, clearly
tantamount to suppression of material facts and the petitioners
being guilty of abuse of process
maintainable in law or on facts. The
Appellants have suppressed material facts and have
Court with clean hand and
further they have suppressed many material facts which
have led to non-payment of their salaries which I wish ... have not approached this Court with
clean hands and they have suppressed material facts which has
led to non-payment of the salary
petition is liable to be dismissed; that the
petitioner has suppressed material facts in that the petitioner
has falsely claimed that her application for regularization
