Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

that Khannas had approached the trial Court with unclean hands and suppressed material and relevant facts and dismissed the appeal. The Khannas preferred a special

follows: a. Exide India/the first plaintiff indulged in gross and material suppression and concealments while obtaining the ex-parte order of injunction as well ... EXIDE‟ amounts to passing off? e) Whether Exide India suppressed any material/relevant facts and, if so, whether the suit deserves to be dismissed

these circumstances the plaintiff could not be accused of duplicity or suppression of material facts. 17. As far as the prior user of the mark ... score are unflawed. 21. The next question is whether there was suppression of material facts by the plaintiff, Saurabh, in regard to non-disclosure

contesting respondents point out that the petitioners are guilty of suppressing material facts in that they did not disclose the filing of another writ petition

There was rather apparently suppression of material facts by them from the department and as such extended period of limitation has rightly been invoked against ... whether the appellant is right in contending that there was no suppression of material facts, or fraud or collusion, justifying invocation of the extended period

assessment notice, there was no question of any material suppression of fact, nor any independent ground constituting valid reasons to believe that could sustain ... contrary, it could not be said that there was suppression of material facts, justifying a notice under Section 147 of the Act. 4. The revenue

defiance of the restraint order passed by the High Court. The suppression of material facts by Bhagwati Developers and the appellants from the Calcutta High ... specific performance of what was sought in suit no. 425/1993). Suppression of material facts in Calcutta High Court takes the plaintiffs herein

dated 1.3.2005. Thus, the defendants are clearly guilty of concealment and suppression of material facts and of making misrepresentation in that suit which is liable

evident that the A.Os., upon proper inquiry and investigation into these materials, were satisfied as to the nature of the petitioner's activities ... opposed to the existing record and (iii) points to suppression of material facts by the assessee in the original return. 6. In the present case

precisely the turnover suppressed. He could only make an estimate of the suppressed turnover on the basis of the material before him. So long ... assuming that the assessing authority must have material before it to prove the exact turnover suppressed. If that is true, there is no question