husband defendant
No. 2 as a confirming party entered into gestational surrogacy agreement dated
16.08.2010 (now Mark A), the plaintiff is the first party ... were
also executed between the parties to give effect to the gestational surrogacy
agreement. Paragraph 14 of the plaint reproduces the obligations undertaken by
defendant
stated that after understanding procedure, plaintiff
entered into a Gestational Surrogacy Agreement dated
10.03.2012 between her on the one hand and defendant ... medical related expenses. It is stated that apart from the said
Gestational Surrogacy Agreement, certain other documents
were also executed between the parties to give
that defendant shall not act in
contravention to the terms of the Surrogacy Agreement dated
18.01.2010 and parties shall remain bound by the terms ... After understanding the process and procedure, the plaintiffs
entered into the Surrogacy Agreement which was between
the plaintiffs on the one hand and the defendant
India but residents of Australia came to India and underwent
Gestational Surrogacy in the year 2019 at a Hospital in New
Delhi known ... asserted that the Plaintiffs entered into a Gesta-
tional Surrogacy Agreement Dated 02.05.2019 with the Defen-
dants whereby Defendant No.1 agreed
decree thereby ordering the defendants to provide / handover all original
documents of surrogacy and complete medical records to the plaintiff.
2. The defendant ... plaintiffs in London suggested the name
of defendant no.3 about the Surrogacy procedure in India. Plaintiffs came
from London to meet the defendant
restraining them from acting in contravention to the terms of the
Gestational Surrogacy Agreement dated 28.08.2019.
3. The brief facts as claimed by the plaintiffs ... that the
plaintiffs opted for Gestational Surrogacy and entered into a
Gestational surrogacy agreement dated 28.08.2019 with the defendants.
Defendant no. 1 agreed
restraining them from acting in contravention
to the terms of the Gestational Surrogacy Agreement dated
21.08.2019.
4. The brief facts as claimed by the plaintiffs ... that the plain
tiffs opted for Gestational Surrogacy and entered into a Gestational
surrogacy agreement dated 21.08.2019 with the defendants. Defen
dant no. 1 agreed
defendants be
restrained from acting in contravention to the terms of
Gestational Surrogacy Agreement dated 23.09.2013 and to
remain bound by the terms ... Vitro Fertilisation but the
same did not succeed and thus, Gestational Surrogacy was
only option left for the plaintiffs, since the plaintiffs were
inclined
shall carry a child for the
plaintiffs through the process of surrogacy, wherein
defendant no. 2 being the husband of defendant no. 1
became ... plaintiff that at such point of
time, no law regarding surrogacy existed in India and
therefore, practice of signing a Surrogacy Agreement was
valid
that the defendants shall not
act in contravention to the terms of surrogacy
agreement dated 04th November, 2011 and the
parties shall remain bound ... West, 7th Street, Plainfield, NJ 07063 USA. They
had entered into one surrogacy agreement with the defendant
no.1 on 04.11.2011. The defendant
