Subhash Kumar Sojatia vs Devilal Dhakad on 31 August, 2023
Subhash Kumar Sojatia vs Devilal Dhakad on 31 August, 2023
Author: Anil Verma
Bench: Anil
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 3142 (2.02 seconds)Derek A C Lobo vs Ulric M A Lobo(Dead) By Lrs on 7 December, 2023
Will as suspicious must plead the suspicious
circumstances and then only the propounder
would legally be bound to remove these
suspicious circumstances.
In Nathia ... record so that the Will can be
said to be a suspicious document and in that
event the onus would shift back on the
propounder
Sh. Pratap Singh & Ors vs Gurdev Singh & Ors on 18 August, 2023
never
claimed that the Will was shrouded in suspicious
circumstances and should be discarded due to suspicious
::: Downloaded on - 18/08/2023 ... about the Will in a manner
which may render it a suspicious document.
The learned District Judge has, therefore,
rightly concluded that the Will
Mohd Iqbal vs State Of Rajasthan Through Pp on 29 September, 2023
doubt on the prosecution version and the parchabayan
itself becomes a suspicious document. The FIR under Section 307
IPC was registered
Pritam Kumar Paikra @ Pritam vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 8 August, 2023
incident and the dying declaration
and Dehati Nalishi are suspicious documents. It is clear from the
memo Ex.P/27 that on 9.5.2020 the deceased ... husband of the
deceased Prakash Paikra (PW-2) is also very suspicious as after
the incident he first went to police station and after that
Saroj Kumar Gond @ Nan vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 8 August, 2023
incident and the dying declaration
and Dehati Nalishi are suspicious documents. It is clear from the
memo Ex.P/27 that on 9.5.2020 the deceased ... husband of the
deceased Prakash Paikra (PW-2) is also very suspicious as after
the incident he first went to police station and after that
Sharad Masih @ Lallu vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 8 August, 2023
incident and the dying declaration
and Dehati Nalishi are suspicious documents. It is clear from the
memo Ex.P/27 that on 9.5.2020 the deceased ... husband of the
deceased Prakash Paikra (PW-2) is also very suspicious as after
the incident he first went to police station and after that
Sri B Sreenivasalu Reddy vs Smt Kuttiammal on 4 August, 2023
existing person and the GPA in his
name was a created document. Exs. P.48 to P.57 are the
statements which are the part ... Thus, when the very GPA at Ex.D.1 is a suspicious
document and defendants could not able to prove that it was a
genuine
Kummara Mallela Venkataramana, vs The State Of A.P., Rep By Pp., on 20 April, 2023
giving
9
statement under Ex.P.9. Ex.P.9 is suspicious document which
was brought into picture when the deceased was in unconscious
state
Shri Jinnappa S/O Dharmanna Kamagoud vs Shri Shantisagar Digambar Jain on 13 February, 2023
Will dated 08-11-2019. The said Will is suspicious
document and it cannot be proved. On these assertions,
the plaintiff has prayed to dismiss