H. Maregowda And Etc. vs Thippamma And Ors. on 1 October, 1999
court below; the question of treating the promissory note as a suspicious document does not arise and the question of capacity of the person lending
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 2037 (0.96 seconds)United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Prakash Shankar Gaurav And Anr. on 21 July, 2005
documents such as a ration card and voters list which are suspicious documents and having regard to the tenor of replies made by respondent
State Of Kadugodi Police, Bangalore vs Gulzar Khan on 11 August, 1995
complaint of Smt. Umadevi was a suspicious document.
14. As poined out above it was not open to the learned Sessions Judge to read
Mrs Maya Akber vs Mrs Rani Menon on 16 August, 2012
suspicious circumstance is also not
sustainable inasmuch as the same do not constitute
'suspicious circumstance' to invalidate a solemn
document. The probate petition ... solemn
document, the same cannot be held to be a suspicious
document merely because the aggrieved person is
excluded from inheritance.
28. The second circumstance
Sadananda Naik vs State Of Karnataka on 11 December, 2020
contended that the Marriage Certificate at Ex.P-2 is a
suspicious document, for the reason that, it does
Smt. Sheetawwa vs Hemareddi on 26 September, 2003
been obtained by the respondent under a misrepresentation that it was a document for security of the loan advanced and the appellant was not made known ... face of it appears to be a highly suspicious document. The appellant besides being illiterate and innocent villager was 75 years old at the time
S. Mallikarjunappa vs The State Of Karnataka, By Its ... on 8 January, 2004
this document before the Land Tribunal.
(c) Respondents 3 and 4 have not satisfactorily explained how they came into possession of this document ... view that the above said document is a suspicious document. Hence the same does not support their case. That apart, the said document
Rukmini Bai W/O Basappa Malnavar And ... vs Umabai W/O Shankar Jadhav And Ors. on 10 December, 2007
itself that, it is a mischief played to make the document to appear suspicious which was not otherwise suspicious, though it is difficult, to point ... regulated his properties cannot be interfered with lightly when the document in not suspicious. Hence, I am of the view that the court below
United India Insurance Co. Limited vs Prakash Shankar Gurav And Anr. on 21 July, 2005
documents such as a ration card and voters list which are suspicious documents and having regard to the tenor to replies made by respondent
Sanjeeva Naika And Anr. vs Shankara Narayana Naika (Since ... on 26 August, 2003
Naika under a registered Will Ex. D2. On the strength of these documents, the defendants 4 and 15 contended that the suit of the plaintiff ... however, held that the Will executed by Thimmanna Naika is a suspicious document, as such held that the Will is void and decreed the suit