supply. In the instant case,
the parties did not stop at synchronised trading. The facts go beyond that. The trade reversals
in this case indicate ... regular trading, other
investors have been excluded from participating in -46 these trades. The fact that when the
trade was not synchronizing, the traders placed
supply. In the instant case,
the parties did not stop at synchronised trading. The facts go beyond that. The trade reversals
in this case indicate ... regular trading, other
investors have been excluded from participating in -46 these trades. The fact that when the
trade was not synchronizing, the traders placed
referred to the decision of the Apex Court
in SEBI Vs. Rakhi Trading Pvt. Ltd. and concluded as under and
dismissed the appeal ... through screen-based trading
and hence anonymous. Such conclusion would be
over-looking prior meeting of minds involving
synchronisation of buy and sell order
development agreement (the agreements)
with its associated enterprises being QUALCOMM Global Trading
and QUALCOMM (parent company).
Hyderabad Unit of QUALCOMM India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged ... agreed between the parties that all
intellectual property rights including patents, software, trade
secrets, related documentation etc. lead by assessee in performing
services under
case of Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Rakhi Trading Pvt. Ltd.
(Civil Appeal Nos . 3174-3177 of 2011, Civil Appeal ... absence of direct proof of
meeting of minds elsewhere in synchronised transactions, the test should be
one of preponderance of (2016) 6 SCC 368 probabilities
Dharani Sugars And Chemicals Ltd vs Union Of India on 2 April, 2019
Equivalent citations
Shri. Mahendra B Mittal Huf, Mumbai vs Dy. Cit Central Circle-8(1), Mumbai on
Tips Industries Ltd vs Wynk Ltd. And Anr on 23 April, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. vs M/S Shreya Broadcasting Pvt. Ltd on 25 February, 2019
Tips Industries Ltd vs Wynk Ltd. And Anr on 23 April, 2019
Author: S.J
